Comments on "Price Stability and Japanese Monetary Policy."
This commentary summarizes the authors' main points of agreement and disagreement with respect to the proposal written by Dr. Hetzel. The authors agree with Dr. Hetzel's proposal on four points: after a central bank has lowered the interest rate to zero, (1) a central bank is not in fact powerless to stop deflation; (2) it does not make sense to focus on the quantity of the monetary base per se; (3) it is important to influence market expectations if monetary policy is to be effective; and (4) central bank solvency holds some importance. The authors disagree with Dr. Hetzel's proposal on three points: (1) transmission channels of quantitative easing; (2) potential costs and benefits of his proposal; and (3) the timing of introduction of an explicit nominal anchor.
Volume (Year): 22 (2004)
Issue (Month): 3 (October)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 2-1-1 Nihonbashi, Hongoku-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103|
Web page: http://www.imes.boj.or.jp/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ime:imemes:v:22:y:2004:i:3:p:25-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kinken)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.