IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

¿Es el ingreso suficiente para explicar cambios en la elección de carrera?

  • Emanuel Vespa

    ()

    (Departamento de Economía y Administración, Universidad Alberto Hurtado)

Registered author(s):

    By influencing her specific labor occupation choice major choices greatly condition the allocation of an individual’s time. Previous economic analysis on the subject has emphasized monetary considerations affecting such a decision, but has been relatively less incisive regarding non pecuniary variables, which are precisely those that psychologists consider as relatively relevant. This paper shows that giving a greater role to non-pecuniary variables may vary and even contradict some previous considerations. In fact, when the non-pecuniary variable enters in the utility function it is shown that if abilities are absolute (being proficient in major i implies being proficient in all others), then average ability will not be affected; whereas, in the relative case, the rise in average ability may be indistinguishable.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.rae-ear.org/index.php/rae/article/view/51
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Ilades-Georgetown University, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Bussines in its journal Revista de Analisis Economico.

    Volume (Year): 20 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 2 (December)
    Pages: 63-90

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ila:anaeco:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:63-90
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Erasmo Escala 1835, 6500620 Santiago
    Phone: (562) 692-0265
    Fax: (562) 692-0303
    Web page: http://www.economia.uahurtado.cl/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Email:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ila:anaeco:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:63-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marcela Perticara)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.