IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v16y2003i3p42-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Culture and Employees' Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • YiHua P. Sheng

    (Southern Illinois University, USA)

  • Michael Pearson

    (Southern Illinois University, USA)

  • Leon Crosby

    (Grand Valley State University, USA)

Abstract

IT-based business initiatives, such as ERP and BPR, require high computer self-efficacy among employees because these changes require a large-scale use of computers. Computer self-efficacy is affected by many internal and external factors, for instance, personality, organizational culture, etc. While extensive literature exists on how psychological and sociological factors affect a person’s self-efficacy, almost no research has been done on how organizational culture could influence employees’ computer self-efficacy. This paper examines the relationship between organizational culture and employees’ self-efficacy for a sample of 352 subjects. The results from multiple regression and discriminant analysis show teamwork and information flow contribute most to employees’ computer self-efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • YiHua P. Sheng & Michael Pearson & Leon Crosby, 2003. "Organizational Culture and Employees' Computer Self-Efficacy: An Empirical Study," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 16(3), pages 42-58, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:16:y:2003:i:3:p:42-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.2003070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bassam Hasan, 2018. "Effects of General and ERP Self-Efficacy Beliefs on the Acceptance of ERP Systems," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:16:y:2003:i:3:p:42-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.