IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jsr000/v15y2017i2p37-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of ISO 9001 Paradox of Knowledge Codification Using the Activity System Model: Tensions in Practices and Expansive Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Hiam Serhan

    (AgroParisTech, Paris, France)

  • Doudja Saïdi Kabèche

    (AgroParisTech, Paris, France)

Abstract

This article analyses the ISO 9001 standard as a generic management tool grounded on three interdependent elements: an artefact of abstract requirements to implement (ostensive routines); a management philosophy that instruments its implementation; and a simplified vision of the organization's relations and knowledge (performative routines). Its two functions are paradoxically oriented to exploitation of codified good practices and to exploration of new knowledge to innovate, create tensions during its implementation in the organization. By applying the activity system model on the French multinational food Groupe (Danone), this research analyses the tensions, learning and innovation outcomes that emerge during the implementation of the knowledge codification requirement in the company. The objective of this article is to illustrate how Danone used the paradox of knowledge codification to create distinctive innovations. It argues that the management of paradoxes depends on the manager's philosophy and competencies to manage cognitive and emotional tensions in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiam Serhan & Doudja Saïdi Kabèche, 2017. "Analysis of ISO 9001 Paradox of Knowledge Codification Using the Activity System Model: Tensions in Practices and Expansive Learning," International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR), IGI Global, vol. 15(2), pages 37-56, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jsr000:v:15:y:2017:i:2:p:37-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJSR.2017070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jsr000:v:15:y:2017:i:2:p:37-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.