IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jesma0/v13y2021i1p15-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences of E-Learning Systems With the Focus on Moodle and Blackboard Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Krešimir Buntak

    (University North, Croatia)

  • Maja Mutavdžija

    (University North, Croatia)

  • Matija Kovačić

    (University North, Croatia)

Abstract

With the development of new technologies and their implementation in all areas of life, especially education, it is important to understand and accept all the new educational/technological concepts and their benefits. Through the concept of virtual learning environment, educational institutions can improve the quality of the learning process, reduce costs, but also improve communication between students and lecturers. The main objective of this paper is to present characteristics of two most used e-learning systems (Moodle and Blackboard) and provide results of the literature review on the differences of these two systems. Based on the results of literature review, a comparison between Moodle and Blackboard based on ISO 25010 framework is made. Through this secondary research, it was concluded that Moodle is the best solution for introducing a learning management system, but there are numerous opportunities for improving the education system at all levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Krešimir Buntak & Maja Mutavdžija & Matija Kovačić, 2021. "Differences of E-Learning Systems With the Focus on Moodle and Blackboard Systems," International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 15-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jesma0:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:15-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJESMA.2021010102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jesma0:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:15-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.