IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v7y2015i1p50-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Investigation of the Jackpine Mine Expansion Dispute in the Alberta Oil Sands

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Xiao

    (Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada)

  • Keith W. Hipel

    (Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada & Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, Canada)

  • Liping Fang

    (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada & Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada)

Abstract

The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) methodology is employed to ascertain strategic insights into a serious conflict over environmental concerns connected to the expanded exploitation of oil sands at the Jackpine Mine Expansion project located in Alberta, Canada. In fact, the expansion of extracting bitumen from large tracts of oil sands in Alberta and its associated potential negative environmental impacts have received increasing attention at the global level. Accordingly, environmentally responsible extended mining of bitumen at the Jackpine site is urgently needed. Hence, the GMCR methodology and its associated decision support system GMCR II are utilized to systematically investigate the conflict of the Jackpine Mine Expansion project. The results imply that the Federal Government of Canada is more concerned about the economic benefits generated by the oil sands projects rather than environmental impacts. It is suggested that more effort should be devoted to the environment conservation by the government.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Xiao & Keith W. Hipel & Liping Fang, 2015. "Strategic Investigation of the Jackpine Mine Expansion Dispute in the Alberta Oil Sands," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 50-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:50-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijdsst.2015010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:50-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.