IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcallt/v10y2020i4p51-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chatbot Experiences of Informal Language Learners: A Sentiment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antonie Alm

    (University of Otago, New Zealand)

  • Larian M. Nkomo

    (University of Otago, New Zealand)

Abstract

In 2016, a number of language applications released chatbots to complement their programmes. Used primarily in informal learning settings, chatbots enable language learners to engage in conversational speaking practice, which can be perceived as less threatening than face-to-face interactions with native speakers. This study takes a closer look at four second language (L2) chatbots—Duolingo, Eggbun, Memrise, and Mondly—and analyses the experiences which informal language learners expressed on various online platforms (e.g., Duolingo forum, Memrise community, Reddit). Results indicate a degree of curiosity and a willingness to engage in conversation with chatbots. However, learners expressed frustration if the dialogues did not correspond to their learning goals or if they were excluded from using the bots because of technical or payment issues, or discontinuation of services.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonie Alm & Larian M. Nkomo, 2020. "Chatbot Experiences of Informal Language Learners: A Sentiment Analysis," International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 51-65, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:51-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCALLT.2020100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reem Alsadoon, 2021. "Chatting with AI Bot: Vocabulary Learning Assistant for Saudi EFL Learners," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(6), pages 135-135, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcallt:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:51-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.