IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iem/imptrs/v6y2015id2822000009376055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using benchmarks from the social sciences in organizations’ headship

Author

Listed:
  • Marinel Adi Mustata

Abstract

The article proposes an exploration of the significance associated with the concept of headship within the larger context of the roles that emerge in organizaţions. In order to avoid biased decisions in favour of one definition or another, I conduct a concise comparative analysis of the General Systems Theory and the Processual-Organic Theory. From choosing the processual system of reference derives the distinction between the roles of headman, leader, administrator, manager and evaluator. The degree in which the role of headman is assumed in a functional fashion, using scientific benchmarks, is tested by means of a sociological inquiry based on a questionnaire. Processing and interpreting data have revealed a modest appetite and an average competence in using benchmarks from the social sciences in the everyday activities of organizations

Suggested Citation

  • Marinel Adi Mustata, 2015. "Using benchmarks from the social sciences in organizations’ headship," Impact of Socio-economic and Technological Transformations at National, European and International Level (ISETT), Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy, vol. 6.
  • Handle: RePEc:iem:imptrs:v:6:y:2015:id:2822000009376055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nos.iem.ro/bitstream/handle/123456789/215/Mustata%20Marinel.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizations; headship; processual-organic approach; use of social science;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A30 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iem:imptrs:v:6:y:2015:id:2822000009376055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ionela Baltatescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imacaro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.