The Internet Market For Quality
The market for the exchange of traffic among networks on the Internet has proved to be remarkably efficient and adaptable.While the issue of network neutrality has dominated policy debates in recent years, the evolution of this market has begun to provide answers to many of the questions raised in these debates.It is establishing the terms under which content will be exchanged among networks and delivered to end users, how traffic will be routed and resources will be deployed to ensure quality of service, and by whom. Underlying changes in consumer demand and industry structure are driving this evolution in the market for Internet traffic exchange, forcing each of the players in the system - including content providers, content delivery networks, and local access networks - to adapt. Even as the terms of peering and transit agreements have become so well understood and accepted that the vast majority of such agreements can be adopted on a handshake basis, without even a written document, parties have also produced new variations on this model to establish terms for the delivery of large volumes of video traffic. While this process may be messy at times, as indicated by the disputes that have arisen over the last year, the performance of this market has so far been quite good. It may therefore be wise for regulatory authorities, having established broad parameters for policy toward net neutrality, to allow the development of the market to continue without intervention, while monitoring its progress.
Volume (Year): 1 (2011)
Issue (Month): 84 (4th quarter)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 33 (0)467 144 444
Fax: 33 (0)467 144 400
Web page: http://www.idate.org/en/Home/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idt:journl:cs8402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (BLAVIER Thomas)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.