IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/wremsd/v10y2014i2-3p372-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of the 'triple pole' approach in bargaining for vertical cooperative advertising and the research challenges for the evolution of this topic in the cooperative advertising literature

Author

Listed:
  • George S. Spais
  • Leonidas A. Papakonstantinidis

Abstract

The research aim of this paper was to measure the value of the 'triple pole' approach in bargaining and investigate the potential evolutions and research challenges considering the evolution of the scholarly research in the cooperative advertising domain based on two studies. For the first study, the authors assessed sets of concepts that best reflect the cooperative advertising theme by conducting a series of multiple linear regression analyses. The regression equation for the sixth model deepened the understanding of how the underlined six key concepts influence the cooperative advertising theme. Trend analyses from 2013-2015 indicated prospects for a significant increase in research activity around five topics. The second study was conducted in order to explore brand manufacturers' perceived value of the 'triple pole' approach in bargaining for vertical cooperative advertising campaigns, based on a survey (pilot study). The comparison of the research results of the two studies allowed identifying several interesting conceptual developments.

Suggested Citation

  • George S. Spais & Leonidas A. Papakonstantinidis, 2014. "The value of the 'triple pole' approach in bargaining for vertical cooperative advertising and the research challenges for the evolution of this topic in the cooperative advertising literature," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2/3), pages 372-404.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:wremsd:v:10:y:2014:i:2/3:p:372-404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:wremsd:v:10:y:2014:i:2/3:p:372-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=173 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.