IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injsem/v8y2017i1-2p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating competitiveness of the convention destination: a primary stakeholders' perspective in Chiang Mai City, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Wanniwat Pansuwong

Abstract

Chiang Mai, Thailand, has been growing in popularity and competitiveness as a destination for the convention industry. This study was conducted to evaluate primary/critical stakeholders' perceptions of the city from an industry perspective to discern how Chiang Mai might build on its recent progress as a convention destination. Quantitative data was collected in early 2016 via a questionnaire survey from 46 stakeholders, including convention venue providers, professional organisers, and hotels facilitating world-class convention facilities and services. The results showed that the stakeholders perceived tourist resources and attractors as well as the city's overall host environment to be highly competitive and strengthening the competitiveness of Chiang Mai as a convention destination. On the other hand, they perceived government-industry cooperation and human resources development as factors less beneficial in contributing to the competitiveness of the city. In addition, the t-test results demonstrated differences in perceptions of stakeholders in terms of human resources, convention infrastructure, and support infrastructure. As a result, Chiang Mai convention industry needs to focus on improving its government-industry cooperation as well as human resources development in order to reinforce its competitiveness and become a preferred convention destination in the region and the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanniwat Pansuwong, 2017. "Evaluating competitiveness of the convention destination: a primary stakeholders' perspective in Chiang Mai City, Thailand," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:8:y:2017:i:1/2:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=84479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:8:y:2017:i:1/2:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=236 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.