IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injsem/v16y2025i4-5p380-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced accuracy of detecting fraudulent product reviews using a fusion machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Pallavi Zambare
  • Ying Liu

Abstract

Spam product reviews are fake or misleading reviews posted to promote a product or service, or to damage a competitor's reputation. They can be difficult to detect, as they are often written to appear legitimate and may include fake profiles or misleading information. Spam product reviews can be harmful to businesses and consumers. Fake reviews and ratings can damage credibility and trustworthiness by misleading consumers about the quality of a product. They can also harm their trust in the review process. It is important for businesses and review platforms to have measures in place to identify and eliminate spam product reviews. Here, we proposed a hybrid technique for identifying fake spam product reviews. This paper first introduces the task of spam online product reviews detection and makes a common definition of spam reviews. Then, we comprehensively conclude the existing method on publicly available datasets. Finally, we have shown the performance comparison for traditional machine learning, deep learning and proposed hybrid classifier. Based on the evaluation it shows that hybrid of CNN and random forest outperforms others.

Suggested Citation

  • Pallavi Zambare & Ying Liu, 2025. "Enhanced accuracy of detecting fraudulent product reviews using a fusion machine learning approach," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4/5), pages 380-406.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:16:y:2025:i:4/5:p:380-406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=148473
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:16:y:2025:i:4/5:p:380-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=236 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.