IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injsem/v15y2024i2p120-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service quality metrics in a teacher training program

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasios Athanasiadis
  • Vassiliki Papadopoulou

Abstract

There are two major methodological approaches to service quality measurement. The first suggests measuring service quality in terms of the difference between customers' expectations and perceptions of a service, whereas the second focuses only on perceptions. In the relevant literature, there is no clear evidence of whether the two methodologies concur or not in their outcomes. Thus, there is a need for more empirical data to help select the most appropriate method of measuring service quality. The present paper aims to test if there are significant differences in service quality measurement as measured by the two approaches in a teacher training program for prospective teachers in Greece. Data collection was based on the EppekQual scale designed for educational contexts, whereas data analysis was carried out according to the confirmation and disconfirmation paradigm. The research sample is comprised of 481 subjects. The analysis conducted revealed statistically significant differences in the measurements of the two methodologies, but the present research does not favour a particular measurement approach as more efficient since data analysis identified slight deviations and therefore proposes the adoption of both methodologies depending on the orientation of the evaluation to reliable data for the educational organisation managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasios Athanasiadis & Vassiliki Papadopoulou, 2024. "Service quality metrics in a teacher training program," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 120-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:120-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137209
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injsem:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:120-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=236 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.