IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v7y2015i1p26-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of working capital management on firm profitability: empirical evidence from Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Athambawa Jahfer

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of working capital management on profitability of manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka for the period 2008 to 2013. It was analysed using both pooled ordinary least squared and fixed effect model. Working capital management were measured using accounts receivable, accounts payable, inventory period, cash conversion cycle and net trading cycle. Gross operating profit was used to measure the profitability. This study finds that managers can create value by reducing accounts receivable and net trading cycle and maintaining reasonable inventory level. The study also finds a significant negative relationship between accounts payable and profitability which is consistent with the view that less profitable firms wait longer to pay their bills. There is no evidence to prove the existence of significant relationship between cash conversion cycle and profitability but there is negative association.

Suggested Citation

  • Athambawa Jahfer, 2015. "Effects of working capital management on firm profitability: empirical evidence from Sri Lanka," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 26-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:26-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=67498
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sathyamoorthi C.R. & Mogotsinyana Mapharing & Popo Selinkie, 2018. "Analytical Procedures Phase of PCAOB Audits: A Note of Caution in Selecting the Forecasting Model," Applied Finance and Accounting, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 82-94, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:26-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.