IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijtrgm/v6y2013i4p326-344.html

Legal origin and financial development: new evidence for old claims? The creditor rights index revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Graff

Abstract

The 'law and finance theory' predicts that the common law system provides the best basis for financial development and economic growth, followed by Scandinavian and German origin civil law and finally French origin civil law. This paper summarises the key points and a number of sceptical views. It outlines an identification problem, since the majority of common law countries have a market-based financial system, whereas the majority of civil law countries have a bank-based one. Furthermore, the conclusion that a common legal tradition implies a similar set of legal rules and procedures to protect financial investors does not hold empirically. Also, later additions to the theory's creditor right indicators data pool are eliminating the (weak) correspondence between business law and legal family that could be found in the original data set. The claim that creditor protection is largely determined by legal tradition has thus to be reconsidered.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Graff, 2013. "Legal origin and financial development: new evidence for old claims? The creditor rights index revisited," International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 326-344.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijtrgm:v:6:y:2013:i:4:p:326-344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=56729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • P00 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijtrgm:v:6:y:2013:i:4:p:326-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=130 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.