IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The capacity to solve problems as a rationale for intertemporal discounting


  • Ulrich Hampicke


The discussion on discounting has reached a more refined stage by now so that some earlier objections made by ethicists as to the moral implications have become obsolete. The standard approach, as suggested in the economic part of the report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, remains none the less questionable. This approach implicitly maximises the present value of all future benefits in a Ramseyan way, which presupposes the existence of one single infinitely long-living pseudoindividual. For an ethicist interested both in efficient resource-use and justice among real humans, this individuomorphic procedure is pointless. In this contribution, it is suggested to use the capacity to solve problems as a yardstick for intertemporal discounting. It is legitimate to discount future events if and only if there is a well-founded expectation that these events will be weighted less important by those who will experience them in the future. In practice, problems have to be divided into two classes. "Vital problems" are those which, according to the best possible forecast, will not decrease in importance in the future. They demand not to be discounted in any outlook committed to sustainability. For "normal problems", it can be expected that their impact will decrease due to an increasing technical, economic and social problem-solving capacity in the future. Currently, the best available proxy for a rate of discount to be applied here might be the overall growth rate of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Hampicke, 2003. "The capacity to solve problems as a rationale for intertemporal discounting," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 98-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:98-116

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Hampicke, Ulrich, 2011. "Climate change economics and discounted utilitarianism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 45-52.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:6:y:2003:i:1:p:98-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.