IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsoma/v2y2006i3p237-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing lot sizing as a source of the Bullwhip Effect: a case study of electronics and furniture supply chains

Author

Listed:
  • Annukka Hejazi
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola

Abstract

The information distortion problem, known as the Bullwhip Effect, is a well-known and continuous concern for manufacturing-related supply chains. One of the main causes of the Bullwhip Effect identified in the literature is the order batching, where actors for example, favour larger lot sizes in their operations as compared to actual customer orders. It is usually explained that this type of behaviour is triggered by rational decisions made in a local context, where the actor tries to minimise own total operational costs. However, we argue in this paper that lot-sizing decisions of an upstream member may also cause order batching at the downstream level of the supply chain, and thus be a major source of the Bullwhip Effect. Therefore, the members of the supply chain seem not only to be locally opportunistic, but also their decisions are based on variables identified in the supply chain level, and most often decisions are made knowing the abilities of upstream manufacturing. We base our research findings on two case studies carried out in the local furniture and international electronics supply chain. On the basis of these two case studies, we argue that production decoupling (make-to-stock versus assembly-to-order) point as well as transfer batching plays a vital role in the management of the Bullwhip Effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Annukka Hejazi & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2006. "Manufacturing lot sizing as a source of the Bullwhip Effect: a case study of electronics and furniture supply chains," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 237-255.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:237-255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9859
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Favaretto & Alessandro Marin & Marco Tolotti, 2021. "A data-driven and risk-based prudential approach to validate the DDMRP planning and control system," Working Papers 09, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsoma:v:2:y:2006:i:3:p:237-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=150 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.