IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v9y2012i1p46-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a QFD trade-off methodology for automotive hydrogen tanks

Author

Listed:
  • Gary P. Moynihan

Abstract

Development of automotive vehicle standards for hydrogen tanks is an emerging process. A series of best practices, in this area, was identified via literature review and confirmed by domain experts. These practices were analysed and integrated to derive an approach for design trade-off analysis. Quality function deployment (QFD) is a well-known Japanese production planning technique. It involves the construction of a series of linked matrices associating customer requirements to progressively more detailed levels of product characteristics. A QFD analogue approach was developed for this research, then applied, using actual experimental data. Fundamental to the application of good systems engineering principles is an understanding of such critical factors as cost, risk (safety) and service life (duration of use), and how these factors relate to the overall design. The key benefit of this effort is the formulation of a means by which any two implementable hydrogen tank designs for vehicles can be compared consistently with regard to trade-off between these critical factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary P. Moynihan, 2012. "Development of a QFD trade-off methodology for automotive hydrogen tanks," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 46-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:46-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:9:y:2012:i:1:p:46-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.