IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v8y2011i4p373-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduce quality processes through DOE: a case study in die casting foundry

Author

Listed:
  • Bikram Jit Singh
  • Dinesh Khanduja

Abstract

This paper deals with various problems of industries which act as bottlenecks in the path of successful optimisation of processes, specifically for foundry units and further it chalks out an integrated approach of design of experiments (DOEs) for its implementation in product or process type industrial environments. DOEs is a structured and organised method for determining the relationships among factors affecting a process and its output. It has been suggested that DOE can offer returns that are four to eight times greater than the cost of running the experiments in a fraction of the time that it would take to run one-factor-at-a-time experiments. This paper gives scope to practitioners and industrialist to reap various financial and non-financial benefits by implementing the suggested easy to understand DOE approach to number of other manufacturing fields. Based upon the methodology proposed, a comprehensive case study in a medium scale piston foundry has been performed to validate the various quality perspectives of given optimisation approach. It is quite rare to see improvement in quality and productivity of process parameters through DOEs, specifically in Indian foundry environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bikram Jit Singh & Dinesh Khanduja, 2011. "Introduce quality processes through DOE: a case study in die casting foundry," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 373-397.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:373-397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:373-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.