IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v7y2011i4p484-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of layout design on productivity: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Shahrul Kamaruddin
  • Sok Yee Khoo
  • Zahid A. Khan
  • Arshad Noor Siddiquee

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study that uses simulation to investigate the performance of different layout designs with respect to different levels of model and head count variability. There are three types of layout designs being examined in this paper: flow line, job shop and cellular layout. These three layouts are evaluated based on three selected performance measures which are throughput time, lateness and labour productivity. These three performance measures are selected because they relate with the overall layout productivity. The simulation model is build by using the WITNESS simulation package and the simulation results are tested in the F-test and Newman-Keuls test. In this study, the radio-cassette player production system has been used as an empirical study. The results show that the effect of headcount variability and model variability do create an impact towards the performance of flow line, job shop and cellular layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahrul Kamaruddin & Sok Yee Khoo & Zahid A. Khan & Arshad Noor Siddiquee, 2011. "The effect of layout design on productivity: an empirical study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 484-500.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:7:y:2011:i:4:p:484-500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=40545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:7:y:2011:i:4:p:484-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.