IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v7y2011i2p148-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative investigation of Toyota's approach in teaching standardised work

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip Marksberry
  • Daniel Vu
  • Bruce Hordusky

Abstract

Many companies strive to utilise Toyota's standardised work (SW) methodology in attempt to make improvements by stabilising existing operations. Unfortunately, most companies who implement SW fail to understand how it is developed to encourage a specific balance between kaizen and standardisation. In turn, most outsiders perceive Toyota to emphasise kaizen over standardisation which causes many of the unique features and characteristics of SW to be improperly understood. This work utilises latent semantic analysis as a new technique to study Toyota's approach in teaching and developing SW. The findings of this work show that Toyota relies on the principles of the Toyota production system to help teach the achievement of SW. Results also show that Toyota emphasises a number of prerequisites to achieve kaizen to make work more consistent and predictable before improving SW. Other findings show the essential features of SW are strongly related to work analysis and the achievement of quality rather than productivity. The benefits of this work is to improve the way SW is designed and developed to better understand how it is achieved in a lean system.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip Marksberry & Daniel Vu & Bruce Hordusky, 2011. "A quantitative investigation of Toyota's approach in teaching standardised work," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 148-167.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:148-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38682
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:7:y:2011:i:2:p:148-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.