IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v5y2010i1p38-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overall line effectiveness – a performance evaluation index of a manufacturing system

Author

Listed:
  • P. Nelson Raja
  • S.M. Kannan
  • V. Jeyabalan

Abstract

Competition is worldwide and markets are fast becoming price sensitive. These challenges are forcing companies to implement various productivity improvement efforts to meet the needs of ever changing market demand. The total productive maintenance (TPM) has provided quantitative metric overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) for measuring the productivity of individual production equipment. In future, an extremely important objective is to improve the performance of the whole process or line instead of concentrating only on a single machine. The traditional metrics like throughput and utilisation rate measures, only the part of the performance of manufacturing equipment. They are not helpful in identifying the problems underlying improvements needed to increase productivity. In this paper, an attempt is made to use overall line effectiveness (OLE) as an index of performance evaluation in the production line of a manufacturing system. A new approach is proposed to assess the quality rate of the manufacturing system using principal component analysis (PCA). A detailed methodology for determining the overall line availability, overall line performance and overall line quality is presented. A case study is carried out and the results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Nelson Raja & S.M. Kannan & V. Jeyabalan, 2010. "Overall line effectiveness – a performance evaluation index of a manufacturing system," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 38-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:38-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=29508
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:38-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.