IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v4y2009i5-6p613-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality improvement of multistage and multi-response grinding processes: an insight into two different methodologies for parameter optimisation

Author

Listed:
  • Indrajit Mukherjee
  • Pradip Kumar Ray

Abstract

Process quality improvement using appropriate optimisation methodology has been a continual research endeavour. However, search for optimal path conditions for multi-stage and multi-response grinding in mass-scale manufacturing still remains a critical and difficult task for researchers. In this context, two different methodologies may be adopted to determine optimal process setting conditions. The first methodology (Methodology-1) is to assume each stage as independent, and thereby determine optimal setting conditions for the individual stages. Based on individual stage optimal process conditions, overall optimal path conditions are selected. Another possible methodology (Methodology-2) for optimisation is to consider all the stages as a single system, with their interdependency, and thereby determine the overall optimal path conditions. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare and contrast the solution quality, as determined by genetic algorithm, and tabu search for both the methodology. The computational results show the relative superiority of tabu search.

Suggested Citation

  • Indrajit Mukherjee & Pradip Kumar Ray, 2009. "Quality improvement of multistage and multi-response grinding processes: an insight into two different methodologies for parameter optimisation," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5/6), pages 613-643.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:4:y:2009:i:5/6:p:613-643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:4:y:2009:i:5/6:p:613-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.