IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v41y2024i4p529-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi criteria analysis of performance evaluation of launch vehicles in the space industry

Author

Listed:
  • S. Mariappan
  • R. Suresh
  • R. Jeyapaul
  • T. Sakthi Nagaraj

Abstract

The new space is more of a commercialising business to create a competitive environment to ensure cost-effective access to space. To be competitive and cost effective, the industry must establish a set of parameters for performance evaluation, which assists the industry in identifying internal strengths and weaknesses for developing appropriate strategic plans. The aim of this study is to prioritise the criterion for performance evaluation of launch vehicles in the space industry using multi criteria analysis (MCA). The performance is assessed using analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and combined AHP - technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The current study through literature review and discussion with subject experts identifies cost, quality, responsiveness, propellant management, configuration, and competence with 18 indicators as sub-criteria for performance evaluation. A numerical case study is presented to identify the best launch vehicle from the selected list of seven heavy lift launch vehicles. This research work also compares the AHP and AHP-TOPSIS results for successful evaluation of launch vehicle based on performance parameters. This methodology helps researchers and decision-makers to better understand the operational performance of launch vehicles in the space industry.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Mariappan & R. Suresh & R. Jeyapaul & T. Sakthi Nagaraj, 2024. "Multi criteria analysis of performance evaluation of launch vehicles in the space industry," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(4), pages 529-552.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:41:y:2024:i:4:p:529-552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:41:y:2024:i:4:p:529-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.