IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v41y2024i3p389-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deployment of Lean Six Sigma framework with environmental considerations in SMEs: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Amr Dahab
  • Mohammad A. Younes
  • Soheir Backar

Abstract

Lean Six Sigma is a potent methodology that uses the statistical tools of Six Sigma to reduce product variability and enhance its quality. Meanwhile, it uses lean techniques to decrease process waste and its negative impact on the environment. Lean Six Sigma initiatives can improve the firm's processes and environmental performance by reducing environmental wastes such as excess raw material consumption and harmful air emissions. This paper proposes a Lean Six Sigma framework while considering SMEs' limited resources and workforce experience to improve their process and environmental performance. The framework simultaneously integrates the DMAIC approach and its statistical tools such as the design of experiments, analysis of variance, and process capability analysis to investigate the product's environmental impact using the lean tools that small enterprises could apply, such as value stream maps and 5S. The framework has been validated in a small-sized candle manufacturing enterprise and successfully implemented. It has led to an improvement in candle sooting by 14.5%, burning lifetime by 12%, and daily candle production by 32.2%; on the other hand, the wax waste decreased by 29.6%.

Suggested Citation

  • Amr Dahab & Mohammad A. Younes & Soheir Backar, 2024. "Deployment of Lean Six Sigma framework with environmental considerations in SMEs: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 41(3), pages 389-417.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:389-417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137323
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:41:y:2024:i:3:p:389-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.