IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v3y2008i4p396-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology to determine maintenance criticality using AHP

Author

Listed:
  • Anish Sachdeva
  • Dinesh Kumar
  • Pradeep Kumar

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a new maintenance decision strategy by integrating the criticality of various factors related to failure and repair of a component/subsystem as an alternative to traditional approach of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). The methodology presented is based on Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) technique which will provide an aid to the maintenance managers/analysts to formulate an efficient and effective priority ranking of the various components/failure modes based on a number of maintenance issues. The principles of the theory and an actual case from a paper industry is undertaken to illustrate the use of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Anish Sachdeva & Dinesh Kumar & Pradeep Kumar, 2008. "A methodology to determine maintenance criticality using AHP," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 396-412.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:396-412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=19757
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohd Safian, Edie Ezwan & Nawawi, Abdul Hadi, 2011. "The Evolution of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a Decision Making Tool in Property Sectors," MPRA Paper 39442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Agung Sutrisno & Hyuck Moo Kwon & Indra Gunawan & Steven Eldridge & Tzong Ru Lee, 2016. "Integrating SWOT analysis into the FMEA methodology to improve corrective action decision making," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 104-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:396-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.