IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v37y2022i4p435-453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applicability of the balanced scorecard in higher education institutions: evidence from Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Al-Dahiyat
  • Mohammad Altarawneh
  • Ismail Altkryty
  • Abd El-Majeed Majali

Abstract

This study contributes to the existing limited body of literature on the appropriateness and applicability of the BSC in higher education institutions (HEIs). It is considered among the first studies, at least in Jordan, which aims at investigating the applicability of the BSC in HEIs, with particular emphasis on a public university in Jordan. The case study methodology has been adopted utilising content analysis and questionnaire methods for data collection. The initial BSC model included 77 KPIs suitable for measuring the strategic performance of the case university grouped under seven perspectives. Using principal component factor analysis statistical technique, the study identified 45 KPIs, as the most important indicators, grouped under 15 components. The study recommends that higher education institutions in Jordan apply the BSC as a modern performance measurement system because of its applicability and appropriateness in enabling higher education administrators to manage their strategies, to attain institutional mission and strategic goals, and to improve accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Al-Dahiyat & Mohammad Altarawneh & Ismail Altkryty & Abd El-Majeed Majali, 2022. "Applicability of the balanced scorecard in higher education institutions: evidence from Jordan," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(4), pages 435-453.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:435-453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:37:y:2022:i:4:p:435-453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.