IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v35y2022i1p78-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of experiments and Monte Carlo simulation-based prediction model for productivity improvement in printing industry

Author

Listed:
  • Santosh B. Rane
  • Prathamesh R. Potdar
  • Nandkumar Mishra

Abstract

In today's cut-throat business competition, productivity improvement is essential for any organisation to reduce high production costs. The objective of this research is to improve the material productivity of the printing process by implementing Six Sigma methodology. In this study, define measure analysis improve and control (DMAIC) approach has been demonstrated with a combination of appropriate tools and techniques in Six Sigma methodology. A prediction model has been developed based on the design of experiment and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). This study identified that start-up waste as a vital cause of less material productivity. This research concludes that every organisation should reinvestigate the process and explore the opportunity for productivity improvement by using the appropriate techniques. This case study has reduced print waste and electricity consumption annually by 89,064 kg and 648,000 kWh, respectively. This productivity improvement case creates an impact on the environment by reducing CO2 emission and chemical waste.

Suggested Citation

  • Santosh B. Rane & Prathamesh R. Potdar & Nandkumar Mishra, 2022. "Design of experiments and Monte Carlo simulation-based prediction model for productivity improvement in printing industry," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(1), pages 78-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:35:y:2022:i:1:p:78-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=120707
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:35:y:2022:i:1:p:78-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.