IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v31y2020i3p369-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An operational approach to gauge the lean performance in bias tyre manufacturing: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Anand Sasikumar
  • Padmanav Acharya

Abstract

Tyre manufacturing firms are facing a host of challenges such as global competition, pricing strategies and complex production process. Due to the complexity of tyre manufacturing process, it is prone to waste which result in non-value added activities across the entire value stream. The study is undertaken in a bias tyre manufacturing firm which is based in the South India. The top management of the case firm is concerned about the increasing non-value added activities. The aim of the study is to devise a template to measure the leanness index of the bias tyre manufacturing firm. The proposed leanness template incorporates the eight types of wastes defined in lean manufacturing paradigm viz. overproduction, unnecessary inventory, waiting, transportation, processing, unnecessary motion, defects and underutilisation of human resource. This will facilitate the people at the operational level to take appropriate decisions. The results of the study indicate that the HR underutilisation and motion are most detrimental wastes in bias tyre manufacturing, which is due to the high rate of absenteeism among workers in all the three shifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand Sasikumar & Padmanav Acharya, 2020. "An operational approach to gauge the lean performance in bias tyre manufacturing: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3), pages 369-389.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:369-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110943
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:369-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.