IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v31y2020i1p49-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The conceptual framework of kaizen influence on employee performance

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Shojaei
  • Parisa Shojaei

Abstract

Kaizen is a complex organisational phenomenon with potential ability to affect both a technical system (e.g., performance of work area) and a social system (for example, participating employees and work area employees). The aim of this study was determination conceptual framework of kaizen implementation effect on employee performance. We conducted two focus groups discussion and five individual interviews. Interviews and focus groups were conducted to determine the effect of kaizen implementation on employee performance. Data were analysed based on deductive-inductive content analysis approach and analysed with Open Code software. Participants' points of view were analysed within 201 codes. Data analysis matrix was the conceptual framework of dimension of kaizen and employee performance. In this conceptual 11 dimension of employee performance include: work quality, work quantity, cooperation, person, security, reliability, initiative, learning and personal development, attitude, judge and leadership. Five dimensions of kaizen include: suggestion system and partnership, work environment regulations, automation, technology and mutual cooperation and between management and staff. There is a need to combine kaizen practices with improvement and innovation practices that help staff and managers to address complex issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Shojaei & Parisa Shojaei, 2020. "The conceptual framework of kaizen influence on employee performance," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 49-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:49-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:31:y:2020:i:1:p:49-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.