IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v30y2020i1p126-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalised linear mixed logit and probit models applied to US Army and Navy data

Author

Listed:
  • Jong-Min Kim
  • Chuwen Li
  • Il Do Ha

Abstract

We apply the generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) with logit and probit links to data (Stevens and Anderson-Cook, 2017a, 2017b), which is univariate data with binary response of passing or failing for complex munitions generated to match age and usage rate found in US Department of Defense complex systems (Army and Navy). Instead of the generalised linear model (GLM) used in Stevens and Anderson-Cook (2017b), we propose to apply the adaptive Gaussian hermite quadrature approach (GLMM-AGHQ) (Ha et al., 2017) to predict binary response of passing or failing for the Army and Navy data. We suggest two methods to find the best models for the Army and Navy. The first method is based on statistical inference, the variance of random effect for intercept term for every GLMM given in this paper, and the log-likelihood. The second method focuses on the accuracy of prediction of each model. We compare the GLMMs with the GLMs in terms of inter quartile range (IQR) of the residuals. We find that the models capturing random effects lead to smaller IQR which in the end results in the high accuracy of the models. This accuracy is measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Suggested Citation

  • Jong-Min Kim & Chuwen Li & Il Do Ha, 2020. "Generalised linear mixed logit and probit models applied to US Army and Navy data," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 126-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:30:y:2020:i:1:p:126-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=107279
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:30:y:2020:i:1:p:126-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.