IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v29y2020i1p24-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on software quality factors and metrics to enhance software quality assurance

Author

Listed:
  • Nigussu Bitew Kassie
  • Jagannath Singh

Abstract

The industries are giving more attention on software quality improvement and assessment, however the majority of researches has been done in the field of internal quality improvement. But, less attention has been given to the user's prospective to improve the quality of a software. The users want the best quality in the usability. The achievement of software companies totally relies upon the user's satisfaction. We focus on customer perspectives of software quality. In this article, first we present some of the existing software quality metrics and their uses. Then, we have accumulated most of the software quality metrics from the literature and prepared a bunch of 27 metrics. Then, we have conducted a survey, with our university students, on the user's perspective to rank the important software quality factors. Based on their responses, we have proposed a new quality model which is user's perspective quality model.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigussu Bitew Kassie & Jagannath Singh, 2020. "A study on software quality factors and metrics to enhance software quality assurance," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(1), pages 24-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:24-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104547
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:29:y:2020:i:1:p:24-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.