IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v27y2019i1p66-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the performance of lean manufacturing implementation with chronological execution of lean elements using spread sheet features: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • R. Sundar
  • A.N. Balaji
  • R.M. Satheesh Kumar

Abstract

Globalisation influences the manufacturing sector to practice the best manufacturing system to sustain in competing business environment. The outcome of this article elucidate the effect of transition from traditional manufacturing practice to lean manufacturing system in a paint brush company located in South India. The existing practice utilises push system where the large batches of raw material are routed from one operation to another along a production line. In this case study, a lean manufacturing system along with sequential implementation of lean elements such as value stream mapping, group technology, cellular manufacturing, U-line manufacturing, etc., is premeditated for reducing the cycle time to relax the Takt time and stabilising the production process. The implemented lean manufacturing system increases the productivity, reduces work-in-process and lead time. The performance measure of lean system such as bottleneck cycle time, production capacity, lead time and work-in-process inventory are evaluated by instant part transfer rate through spread sheet model.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Sundar & A.N. Balaji & R.M. Satheesh Kumar, 2019. "Analysing the performance of lean manufacturing implementation with chronological execution of lean elements using spread sheet features: a case study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(1), pages 66-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:66-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:66-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.