IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v24y2018i1p33-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical hierarchy process for selecting best attributes for successful 5S implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Jugraj Singh Randhawa
  • Inderpreet Singh Ahuja

Abstract

5S technique requires significant attributes for its successful implementation in the manufacturing organisations. Successful adoption of 5S philosophy necessitates the involvement from top management to bottom level of employees and many other attributes in the organisations in order to establish an appropriate platform for the implementation of other lean manufacturing initiatives. The research helps to select the best attributes thorough the attempt by developing a model of 5S technique decision making by utilising the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The research paper presents the framework for selecting the best attributes for the successful implementation of 5S technique which act as base foundation for standing the pillars of other quality tools and enhance the business excellence. The significant attributes highlighted in this study can guide the top management to focus on crucial areas and allocating necessary resources for ensuring successful 5S implementation in manufacturing organisations. Further, the study also establishes AHP framework for providing the justification of 5S implementation in manufacturing organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jugraj Singh Randhawa & Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, 2018. "Analytical hierarchy process for selecting best attributes for successful 5S implementation," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 24(1), pages 33-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:33-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:33-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.