IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v23y2018i4p446-472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of axioms and assumptions of data envelopment analysis: application for efficiency measurement in project management contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Pooria Niknazar
  • Mario Bourgault

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is increasingly used to measure projects' efficiency, as recent research contributions indicate. However, most studies in project management take the axioms and assumptions underlying DEA for granted or do not pay attention to the type of data they are working with. Lack of attention to these important factors leads to selection of inappropriate DEA models and, consequently, produces biased efficiency scores. In this paper, after arguing that DEA is an appropriate model for project efficiency measurement, the economic meaning of its axioms and assumptions is explained. We also explain how different data types require some modifications in the CCR model. As a result, a guideline is presented to help future project management scholars select an appropriate DEA method tailored for their specific situation. Further, to highlight the importance of paying attention to these issues, we empirically demonstrate the high sensitivity of DEA results to the applicability of underlying DEA axioms and assumptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooria Niknazar & Mario Bourgault, 2018. "Analysis of axioms and assumptions of data envelopment analysis: application for efficiency measurement in project management contexts," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(4), pages 446-472.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:23:y:2018:i:4:p:446-472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90259
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:23:y:2018:i:4:p:446-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.