IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v23y2018i3p307-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of organisational culture and organisational learning on organisational innovation: an empirical investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Rezaei
  • Sayyed Mohsen Allameh
  • Reza Ansari

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of organisational culture and organisational learning on organisational innovation in knowledge-based companies. Participants included top and middle managers of knowledge-based, start-up and industrial knowledge-based companies. The 133 questionnaires were analysed. This study used a correlational methodology by structural equations modelling in the form of partial least squares to test the measurement model and hypotheses. The results showed that adhocracy culture and clan culture had a positive effect on organisational learning, and market culture and hierarchy culture had a negative effect on organisational learning. Moreover, adhocracy culture and clan culture had a positive effect on technological and administrative innovation, while market culture and hierarchy culture were considered as a barrier to innovation. It was also found that organisational learning had a positive effect on technical and administrative innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Rezaei & Sayyed Mohsen Allameh & Reza Ansari, 2018. "Effect of organisational culture and organisational learning on organisational innovation: an empirical investigation," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(3), pages 307-327.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:23:y:2018:i:3:p:307-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=89803
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:23:y:2018:i:3:p:307-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.