IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v22y2017i4p485-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who are hindering shop floor productive hours? An exploratory finding from discrete manufacturing industries of India

Author

Listed:
  • Manoj Kumar Mohanty
  • Padma Charan Mishra
  • Manmohan Mall

Abstract

Indian manufacturing sector contributes about 15% of India's gross domestic product (GDP), 50% to the country's exports and employed about 12% of the total workforce. Government of India expects about 25% of contribution to GDP from manufacturing industries by 2022. This calls for a special focus on manufacturing sector and optimal use of resources. For effective availability time, idle hour have to be cut down from various operations. This study was conducted on three large scales discrete manufacturing industries of India. Based on the customer requests/requirements tailor made products are being manufactured in these organisations. This study found poor panning, unclear manufacturing documents to production, pending decisions, movement of materials from operations to operation, want of crane, layout, skill set of operators, absenteeism, union work, breaks between working hours, machine breakdown and rework as prominent attributes. Planning and workforce related issues are surfacing out clearly for generation of idle hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Manoj Kumar Mohanty & Padma Charan Mishra & Manmohan Mall, 2017. "Who are hindering shop floor productive hours? An exploratory finding from discrete manufacturing industries of India," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 485-498.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:485-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87865
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:485-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.