IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v18y2016i4p440-455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the capability of laser scanning to measure an automotive artefact: a comparison study of touch trigger probe and laser-scanning

Author

Listed:
  • Ercihan Kiraci
  • Glen A. Turley
  • Alex Attridge
  • Alan Olifent
  • Mark A. Williams

Abstract

In the automotive industry dimensional quality control is an important part of the production process, often carried out using coordinate measuring machines (CMMs). However, CMMs used in conjunction with touch probes have a relatively low measurement speed. There is also a close link between the cost of measurement and the number of discrete points captured, leading to a trade-off between the number of points that can be measured and the measurement time. Laser scanners offer a faster alternative to touch probe measurement, but have certain limitations. A number of studies have considered the accuracy of laser scanning using small artefacts; however, little work has been done on the verification of on-CMM laser scanning systems for large volume, industry-relevant measurement applications. In this research, a nominal representation of a vehicle body was used and 104 standard features were measured. The results show that the laser scanning sensor and CMM used in this study would, for the majority of measurements, provide a level of accuracy and repeatability better than which is typically required by automotive manufacturers for body shell quality inspection applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ercihan Kiraci & Glen A. Turley & Alex Attridge & Alan Olifent & Mark A. Williams, 2016. "Evaluating the capability of laser scanning to measure an automotive artefact: a comparison study of touch trigger probe and laser-scanning," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 440-455.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:18:y:2016:i:4:p:440-455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:18:y:2016:i:4:p:440-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.