IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v18y2016i2-3p137-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A life cycle approach to robust design methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Vanajah Siva
  • Ida Gremyr
  • Hendry Raharjo
  • Bolennarth Svensson

Abstract

This paper proposes a new practice of robust design methodology (RDM); to adopt a life cycle approach to noise factor identification. Such practice expands the boundary of traditional use of robust design where noise factors are generally known, observable and experimentally controllable. By exploiting information from claim data of a medium-sized Swedish manufacturing company, several other noise factors were identified and classified into product life cycle stages; factors that are often uncontrollable, unobservable, or unknown. Exploratory data analysis, interviews, and internal documents are used in this study. The results show that by analysing the claims data, the product's failure modes can be identified and classified into various product life cycle stages. This enables identification of noise factors in each product life cycle stage. The use of a life cycle approach has two major implications. One is to expand the focus of RDM to encompass all product life cycle stages instead of being limited to a product development process. The other implication is that the practice proposed facilitates consideration of more stakeholders, in addition to one single customer by looking at consequences for society at large once the product is in use. Hence, the proposed RDM practice can be supportive of sustainable product development.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanajah Siva & Ida Gremyr & Hendry Raharjo & Bolennarth Svensson, 2016. "A life cycle approach to robust design methodology," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(2/3), pages 137-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:18:y:2016:i:2/3:p:137-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76704
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:18:y:2016:i:2/3:p:137-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.