IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v17y2016i2p215-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy analytical network process

Author

Listed:
  • Samaneh Mirzaei
  • Soroush Avakhdarestani

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a risk assessment tool that decreases potential failures in systems, processes, designs or services has been used in a wide range of industries. The conventional risk priority number (RPN) method has been criticised to have many deficiencies various risk priority models have been proposed in the literature to increase the performance of FMEA. In a traditional FMEA, for each failure modes, three risk factors of severity (S), occurrence (O), delectability (D) are evaluated a risk priority number (RPN) is obtained by multiplying these factors. Significant efforts have been made in FMEA literature to overcome the shortcomings of the crisp RPN calculation. In this study, a fuzzy approach, allowing experts to use linguistic variables for determining pair-wise comparisons, was considered for FMEA by applying fuzzy preference priority (FPP) technique integrated with fuzzy analytical network process (ANP). The case study demonstrated the applicability of the model in FMEA under fuzzy environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Samaneh Mirzaei & Soroush Avakhdarestani, 2016. "Development of failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy analytical network process," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(2), pages 215-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:215-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=74461
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:215-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.