IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v17y2016i2p198-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of organisational units based on key performance indicators with agility approach by using MADM, QFD; a case study in Darakar Company

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Shirouyehzad
  • Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei
  • Elmira Shahgholi

Abstract

In recent years, due to increasing competition among organisations, making a competitive advantage has become a vital issue for organisation to survive in current competitive context. Organisation agility results in progressive improvement and customers' ideal quality achievement and makes the organisation reach their competitive advantage. Therefore, the present study presents a method for prioritisation of organisation units based on key performance indicators with agility approach. Hence, firstly, KPIs factors and agility capabilities factors are determined and next, relevance and effectiveness of each agility factors on KPIs will be specified by QFD. In this paper, TOPSIS employed to rank the units. Darakar Company has been selected as the case study and findings reveal that in this company, factors of 'changing' and 'training and education' have the most noticeable effect on key performance indicators and 'production' units has the best score.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Shirouyehzad & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei & Elmira Shahgholi, 2016. "Performance evaluation of organisational units based on key performance indicators with agility approach by using MADM, QFD; a case study in Darakar Company," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(2), pages 198-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:198-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=74447
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:198-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.