IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v15y2015i1p57-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six Sigma management and grey relational analysis to improve performance of tableting process

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Al-Refaie
  • Kawther Al-Hmaideen

Abstract

This research implements the well-known Six Sigma approach define-measure-analyse improve-control (DMAIC) to improve the performance of direct compression process with two quality responses: tablet's weight and hardness. At define phase, the x-bar and s charts are established and judged in-control for both responses. To measure performance, the values of the actual capability indices for hardness and weight are estimated 1.5 and 0.587, respectively, which indicate that the tableting process is capable for tablet's hardness but it is incapable for weight. At the analyse and improve phases, designed experiments utilising the Taguchi's L27 array followed by the grey relational analysis (GRA) technique are implemented to determine the combination of factor levels that enhance process performance. After process improvement, the capability index values are found equal to 3.31 and 0.848. To control performance, the value of the multivariate capability index is found equal to 0.938 at initial factor settings, while it is enhanced using optimal factor settings to 1.68. Finally, the multivariate control charts for Hotelling T² and generalised variance are employed to monitor future production. In conclusion, the DMAIC approach including GRA techniques is found effective for improving the performance of direct compression with tablet's weight and hardness.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Al-Refaie & Kawther Al-Hmaideen, 2015. "Six Sigma management and grey relational analysis to improve performance of tableting process," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 57-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:57-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:15:y:2015:i:1:p:57-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.