IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v14y2014i3p296-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • M. Ilangkumaran
  • P. Shanmugam
  • G. Sakthivel
  • K. Visagavel

Abstract

This paper develops an evaluation model based on failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), to help the maintenance person for assessing the risk priority of the critical components in the paper industry to provide timely maintenance. Traditional FMEA determines risk priority number (RPN) by multiplying the scores of three factors. However the scores which are computed through traditional FMEA do not considere relative importance of the factors. The FAHP is used to compute the relative weights of the decision factors. A numerical example is used to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Ilangkumaran & P. Shanmugam & G. Sakthivel & K. Visagavel, 2014. "Failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 296-313.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:296-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64807
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Priyank Srivastava & Dinesh Khanduja & V. P. Agrawal, 2020. "Agile maintenance attribute coding and evaluation based decision making in sugar manufacturing plant," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 553-583, June.
    2. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Priyank Srivastava & Dinesh Khanduja & Subramaniam Ganesan, 2020. "Fuzzy methodology application for risk analysis of mechanical system in process industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 297-312, April.
    4. Vijay Pereira & Umesh Bamel, 2023. "Charting the managerial and theoretical evolutionary path of AHP using thematic and systematic review: a decadal (2012–2021) study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 635-651, July.
    5. Dilbagh Panchal & Priyank Srivastava, 2019. "Qualitative analysis of CNG dispensing system using fuzzy FMEA–GRA integrated approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(1), pages 44-56, February.
    6. Ferenc Bognár & Csaba Hegedűs, 2022. "Analysis and Consequences on Some Aggregation Functions of PRISM (Partial Risk Map) Risk Assessment Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Ilyas Mzougui & Zoubir El Felsoufi, 2021. "A modified method to improve failure analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(2), pages 231-244, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:296-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.