IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v12y2013i1p77-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal marketing for Six Sigma success: a conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Sam K. Formby
  • Dinesh S. Dave

Abstract

Six Sigma methodology has been described as a process improvement tool responsible for billions of dollars in business improvements and is the most popular improvement methodology in use in businesses today. Yet, in spite of its popularity, both managers and Six Sigma teams often express frustration over incomplete implementations that fail to live up to the benefits planned by the Six Sigma teams. Interestingly, this frustration is common even in companies with strong corporate commitment to Six Sigma methodology. In addition, a recurring theme for over twenty years in quality management literature is frustration with the implementation of continuous improvement initiatives and inconsistencies in long term gains. The breakdown of organisational support for improvements is frequently blamed. Could weaknesses in implementation and organisational support be related to a lack of internal marketing of changes to the workforce? Can regulatory fit theory help explain these phenomena? This study looks at Six Sigma projects as process improvement 'products and/or services' that need to be marketed to the workforce in order to accomplish lasting benefits. Regulatory fit theory is applied and a Kano model survey methodology is proposed to examine the effects of internal marketing on long term improvement success.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam K. Formby & Dinesh S. Dave, 2013. "Internal marketing for Six Sigma success: a conceptual framework," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 77-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:12:y:2013:i:1:p:77-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54864
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:12:y:2013:i:1:p:77-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.