IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v10y2012i3p267-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principal component analysis (PCA)-based approaches for the multi-response optimisation: an issue and the recommendation

Author

Listed:
  • Rina Chakravorty
  • Susanta Kumar Gauri
  • Surajit Pal

Abstract

One weakness in Taguchi method is that it focuses on optimisation of single response variable only whereas most of the modern manufacturing processes demand for simultaneous optimisation of multiple responses, and some of these responses are often correlated. Recently some principal component analysis (PCA)-based approaches have been proposed in literature which aims at making the Taguchi method useful for optimising correlated multiple responses too. The implicit assumption made in these procedures is that the correlations among the response variables can be taken care by taking into account the correlations among the signal-to-noise ratios of the response variables. This article shows that this assumption may not be true always. Therefore, some corrections are proposed in the computational procedures of PCA-based approaches, which are described taking into consideration weighted principal component and PCA-based grey relational analysis methods. The results of analysis of two sets of past experimental data indicate that the corrected PCA-based approaches result in substantial improvement in the overall optimisation performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rina Chakravorty & Susanta Kumar Gauri & Surajit Pal, 2012. "Principal component analysis (PCA)-based approaches for the multi-response optimisation: an issue and the recommendation," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 267-287.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:267-287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=48750
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:267-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.