IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v5y2013i4p377-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the leadership style in Malaysian construction firms

Author

Listed:
  • Mastura Jaafar
  • Cheng Chye Nee

Abstract

The current competitive environment proposes that a proper leadership style in a construction firm is necessary to sustain business and to keep pace with rapid changes. Based on Bass and Avolio's transformational and transactional leadership theory, the objective of this study is to investigate the leadership styles of owner-managers and the preference of leadership styles by subordinates in Malaysian construction firms. It also aims to compare the leadership styles of Malay and Chinese owner-managers and to assess the relationship between leadership styles and leadership outcomes. Based on a survey of 31 subordinates, the findings of this study showed that the majority of owner-managers mainly practise transformational leadership style. However, the subordinates place a higher ranking on the preferred transformational leadership style exerted by their employers. The subordinates also demand more reward and recognition for their job. Moreover, the findings revealed that some Malay owner-managers lean toward adopting a laissez-faire leadership style compared to their Chinese counterparts. The dominance of transformational leadership style applied in construction firms provides significant contribution to leadership outcomes in terms of effectiveness, satisfaction, and extra effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Mastura Jaafar & Cheng Chye Nee, 2013. "An assessment of the leadership style in Malaysian construction firms," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 377-390.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:377-390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=58381
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:377-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.