IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v2y2010i4p361-381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study for project and portfolio management information system selection: a group AHP-scoring model approach

Author

Listed:
  • Vassilis C. Gerogiannis
  • Panos Fitsilis
  • Dimitra Voulgaridou
  • Konstantinos A. Kirytopoulos
  • Evi Sachini

Abstract

Features variety, variations among organisations' needs and the plethora of powerful project and portfolio management (PPM) information systems in the market, make the selection process among various PPM information systems a complicated process. The large number of the evaluation criteria involved during the decision aggravates the problem. This paper addresses the limitation of the number of criteria in such complex decision problems. It develops a hybrid model that exploits the benefits of the group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) along with the simplicity of the scoring model for justifying the final selection. The proposed approach permits consideration of much more criteria than the typical AHP approach can reasonably handle and takes into account experts' opinions for the comparison of the PPM information systems as well as users' opinions on specific preferences/ needs. The proposed approach is applied on a real case in a public Greek organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Vassilis C. Gerogiannis & Panos Fitsilis & Dimitra Voulgaridou & Konstantinos A. Kirytopoulos & Evi Sachini, 2010. "A case study for project and portfolio management information system selection: a group AHP-scoring model approach," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 361-381.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:361-381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=35873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarbast Moslem & Muhammet Gul & Danish Farooq & Erkan Celik & Omid Ghorbanzadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "An Integrated Approach of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Triangular Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Sophia Xiaoxia Duan & Santoso Wibowo & Josephine Chong, 2021. "A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Agriculture Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Agribusiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Min-Chi Chiu & Tin-Chih Toly Chen & Keng-Wei Hsu, 2020. "Modeling an Uncertain Productivity Learning Process Using an Interval Fuzzy Methodology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:361-381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.