IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v18y2026i1p1-23.html

Navigating project success in infrastructure sector: broadening the lens of the traditional triple constraints of time, cost, and scope

Author

Listed:
  • Naresh Gupta
  • Indra Gunawan
  • Rajeev Kamineni

Abstract

This research revisits the conventional understanding of project success within the infrastructure sector by distinguishing between project management success and comprehensive project success. It explores whether integrating the triple constraints of time, cost, and scope is sufficient or if broader objectives and stakeholder alignment are equally vital. Employing an exploratory approach, this study draws insights from case studies selected through purposeful sampling and observational techniques. Data are gathered from diverse secondary sources, including peer-reviewed journals, articles, books, government/ corporate reports. The findings reveal that while meeting traditional triple constraints signifies project management success, it does not guarantee overall success. Comprehensive success reflects alignment with stakeholder expectations and organisational performance standards. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the need for a holistic evaluation of project success, encouraging alignment with societal and environmental goals, and providing guidance for sustainable infrastructure development. It empowers project managers with deeper insight into success.

Suggested Citation

  • Naresh Gupta & Indra Gunawan & Rajeev Kamineni, 2026. "Navigating project success in infrastructure sector: broadening the lens of the traditional triple constraints of time, cost, and scope," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:1-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=151971
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.