IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v12y2020i3p240-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivational paradox: a Delphi study to reach a consensus knowledge regarding individual vs. team motivation in the context of project-based organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Saad Zighan

Abstract

Motivation can have paradoxical effects on the performance of projects and their outcomes. The aim of this study is to develop an effective system of motivation in the context of project-based organisations. The responses were captured through a four-round of online-Delphi. The study finds a strong reciprocal relationship between the motivation at individual level and motivation at team level, since the sub-objectives that individuals pursue are likely to be strongly related to each other and contribute to the goal that the team mutually generates and pursues. Motivation at individual and team level is correspondingly consistent in terms of three main aspects: goal-generation, goal-striving and motivational-states. Thus, an inclusive conceptualisation of motivation within the project team requires a multilevel-approach of horizontal and vertical alignments of motivational objectives and practices. This could be attained by developing an appropriate project structure and team process that can maximise individuals' contributions and minimise the inter-conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Saad Zighan, 2020. "Motivational paradox: a Delphi study to reach a consensus knowledge regarding individual vs. team motivation in the context of project-based organisations," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:240-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:12:y:2020:i:3:p:240-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.