IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v15y2023i3p285-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking the financial performance of Indian commercial banks by a hybrid MCDM approach

Author

Listed:
  • Pawan Kumar
  • Deergha Sharma

Abstract

The current research has presented a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) strategy to assess the financial performance of the ten major commercial banks operating in India from 2016-2017 to 2020-2021. The essential financial performance indicators were obtained from secondary literature and subsequently prioritised using a fuzzified rating scale by applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach. The financial condition of chosen institutions was weighted using the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The cumulative ranking of the selected banks was eventually determined via interval-valued TOPSIS (IV-TOPSIS). The analysis found that return on equity is the most essential of all the financial performance measures, and Bandhan Bank is the top performer among all the examined banks. The study results have proposed specific financial performance standards and provided a requirement for trailing institutions to improve their financial status. The breadth of the study is crucial for bank management and policymakers in the field of strategic decision-making for sustainable banking systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawan Kumar & Deergha Sharma, 2023. "Benchmarking the financial performance of Indian commercial banks by a hybrid MCDM approach," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 285-309.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:285-309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:285-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.